The Incompetent Annual Review

Can be found in the Category: Performance - 06 Sep 2005

Someone recently responded to my blog by describing their fearless leader’s attempt at doing an annual review. There is a disclaimer here. I am assuming what this reader has shared is totally factual.

So here is the reader’s description of her annual reviews:

“In 16 years at my last job, my annual reviews were an opportunity for my boss (Director) to nit pick and criticize about little petty things from 11 months prior, or we talked about his latest “new toy” he purchased. I knew everything about him, kids, wife, parents and in-laws. Even his neighbors. He didn’t even now that I had a child. Better yet, would have been to celebrate my many achievements and all the money I saved the company. I have to admit my bonuses were great - he always rated me Superior Performance, so there was some solace in getting the money. But he would never tell me that, why? So although the mid 5 figure bonuses were appreciated, the lack of acknowledgement did offend me.”

Wow!

We can learn from this post. If this boss is for real, the Blogging Boss assumes he is a menace to corporate America.

Why?

1) An annual review should have NO surprises! None. Zero. If this boss had issues during the past year they should have been addressed all through the year. You NEVER dump on an employee during an annual review. NEVER. Stupid, stupid, stupid. I really hate this.

2) The employee knows all about the boss (most likely their personal life was vomited upon the employee). The boss never listened enough to even hear that the employee actually had a child. Folks, this is the NORM! Most managers have wax-filled ears. Even if they had it removed they still could NOT listen.

3) The boss never acknowledged exactly what the employee did well. Yet the boss compensated as if the employee was doing a stellar job. People want to know what they are doing well. This is KEY to self-esteem and confidence. This boss compensated at a high level, but did not marry the compensation to the accomplishments. BOOOO!

So what do we take away from this wonderful post?

1) The boss was self-centered and never made an effort to learn more about the employee. Actually my guess is that he really did not care.

2) He used an annual review to needle the employee and then sent a mixed signal. The employee was never told WHY they deserved a 5 figure bonus (not a trivial bonus).

3) The employee was compensated for the level of achievement but never appropriately coached or mentored.

4) The resulting message was “money is good.” The net result - offensive management. “My boss has offended me and has not been my advocate.”

On the Blogging Boss scale, this manager gets a barely a 1 on a scale from 1 to 5. He has violated some very important principles as an advocate, servant and leader.

Send me your comments!

6 Comments

  1. Comment by Omnipotent Poobah

    I was once asked to help a manager with writing a review for one of his employees on a “monitoring program”. Why I, a peer of the reviewee, was asked to do this is a whole other story. Suffice it to say that I’ve had the ill-fortune to work for some of the world’s biggest boneheads.

    To this day I remember the beginning line of the original review the manager wrote, “Ron’s sole redeeming feature is that he dresses well.”

    Needless to say, I don’t work there anymore.

  2. Comment by Uinseann

    I just went through my review a few weeks ago. Since I am a manager myself, my review was to be one of the first and before all of my staff. It was put off 8 separate times over the course of a month and a half and became the second last. Once I arrived at the review, my manager completely skipped over the entire last page of the review, where I laid out my five year career plan and my plans for improving my department. I defintely feel like I have a long future here.

  3. Comment by Eric

    uinseann,

    Your situation is the norm, unfortunately. The key is not to accept it as the norm. You need to find another manager/company. Your value will never be recognized by a manager like this.

    Start taking steps now.

  4. Comment by Gimikera

    Would it be ideal to have more frequent reviews spread over the year or is it better to have one major annual review?

  5. Comment by Eric

    Gimikera,

    I believe the review process should go on continually. There should be ar least 3 or 4 annual check points where you and your boss sit face to face and talk.

    Your boss should be telling you what you are good at and make any corrections throughout the year. The annual review should be a summary of all that you have accomplished and where you need improvement.

    Again, no surprises, ever!

    Thanks for the question.

  6. Comment by Gone Away

    Absolutely right. I can remember some pretty stupid annual reviews that I’ve been subjected to as well.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Want to get my latest post sent to you?

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner